Reducing Interference From Closely Proximate Wireless Units

ABSTRACT

A wireless device may include two or more wireless interfaces capable of transmitting and/or receiving signals over separate wireless networks. To reduce the likelihood of interference, a processing unit may determine whether to permit a transmission under one wireless network when a reception under another wireless network is already in progress.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/434,782, filed on May 9, 2003.

BACKGROUND

This invention relates generally to devices which receive and transmit wireless signals.

A variety of devices may be involved in receiving and transmitting wireless signals. A variety of processor-based systems may communicate with one another in a wireless network over relatively short or longer range distances. In addition, devices such as cell phones that have been conventionally thought of as communication devices may also function as processor-based systems.

As a result, in a number of different instances, devices may be able to send and receive wireless signals from the same or closely proximate hardware operate under two or more different wireless protocols on the same processor-based system. In addition, devices may operate in two or more different wireless networks from the same processor-based system. Thus, each network or protocol may be generally unaware of communications in the other network or protocol.

As a result of the ability to send and receive signals at the same time from proximate devices, one device may fail to account for the other. One result may be interference between communications in the two different wireless devices.

Thus, there is a need for ways to control or reduce interference when proximate devices coupled to a common processor-based system, are able to transmit and receive wireless signals at the same time over different wireless networks.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a hardware schematic view of one embodiment of the present invention; and

FIG. 2 is a flow chart for software in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Referring to FIG. 1, a wireless device 10 may be a processor-based system or a communication device. Examples of processor-based systems include desktop, laptop, and portable processor-based systems, commonly known as computers. Examples of wireless communication devices include cellular telephones, wireless network interfaces, and access points for wireless networks.

In some embodiments, the wireless device 10 may be controlled by a single processor that controls both the wireless transmission and the general processing tasks. In other cases, one processor may be utilized for wireless communications and another processor may handle the execution of any of a wide variety of software applications.

In the embodiment shown in FIG. 1, a separate digital signal processor 11 and general purpose processor 12 are illustrated. However, any type of controller may be used. The general purpose processor 12 may be responsible for executing various applications while the digital signal processor 11 may be responsible for handling wireless communications. In some cases additional processors may be provided. In other cases, one or more general purpose processors may be utilized. In some cases one or more digital signal processors may be utilized.

In one embodiment, the general purpose processor 12 may be coupled to a storage 14 that may store one or more applications, such as the application 16. The storage 14 may take a wide variety of forms. In battery powered applications, the storage 14 may be, for example, a flash memory. In other cases, the storage 14 may be a hard drive. In general, the storage 14 may be any semiconductor memory, any disk-based memory, or, in general, any device capable of storing an application program.

The processors 11 and 12 may be coupled by a bus 18 to a pair of network interfaces 20 a and 20 b in one embodiment. Each network interface 20 a or 20 b may be coupled to a different wireless network in one embodiment. Currently, a variety of wireless protocols are in widespread use. For example, cellular telephones may use a variety of wireless protocols including time division, code division, and analog protocols, to mention a few examples. Also, personal computers and other devices may communicate over short-range wireless protocols, such as the Bluetooth protocol (See Bluetooth Specification v. 1.1 (2003)) or ultra-wide band, also known as digital pulse wireless, as well as longer range wireless protocols, such as the IEEE 802.11 protocol (See IEEE 802.11, 1999 Edition (ISO IEC 8802-11; 1999). In addition, various wireless networks may be set up, such as personal area networks (PANs). These wireless networks may use the same or different wireless protocols, and they may be managed independently of one another.

For example, one wireless network may operate at 5 gigaHertz according to an 802.11a protocol and another wireless network may operate at from 3.1 to 10.6 gigaHertz at low power according to an ultra-wide band protocol. Thus, the operating frequencies of the two protocols overlap, making interference likely if a system attempts to transmit on one protocol and to simultaneously receive on the other protocol.

As a result, in one embodiment, for one or a variety of reasons, the wireless interfaces 20 a and 20 b may be coupled to the networks that are relatively independent of one another. The problem that arises is that one of the interfaces, such as the interface 20 a, may attempt to transmit while the other interface 20 b is attempting to receive. In many cases, the simultaneous proximate transmission and reception would result in interference absent coordination between the interfaces 20.

Within any given wireless network there may be protocols for reducing interference. These protocols may prohibit one wireless entity from transmitting while other wireless entities within the network, including the transmitting entity, are attempting to receive. However, where a single device 10 is capable of participating in disparate, uncoordinated, networks, such coordination may not be available because each network may operate independently of other networks.

Using the application 16, the general purpose processor 12 may control the wireless interfaces 20 to avoid at least in some cases, transmitting over one interface, such as the interface 20 a, when the interface 20 b is attempting to receive, in one embodiment. To this end, the processors 11 and 12 may communicate with one another.

The connection between the bus 18 and each interface 20 a or 20 b may be a wired or wireless connection. In addition, the interfaces 20 a and 20 b may be proximate or remote from the processors 11 and 12.

Each network interface 20 a and 20 b may include an antenna 22 a or 22 b that, in one embodiment of the present invention, may be a dipole antenna. In one embodiment, the antennas 22 may be responsible for both transmission and reception of signals. More or less antennas may be utilized in other embodiments of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 2, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, the coordinating software 16 begins by determining whether there is a radio frequency transmit request from one of the interfaces 20 as determined at diamond 24. If so, a check at diamond 26 determines whether the other of the interfaces 20 is currently receiving a signal. If not, the interface 20 requesting permission to transmit is authorized to transmit as indicated in block 34. If another interface is currently receiving a signal, as determined in diamond 26, transmission may be deferred as indicated in block 28.

At diamond 30, the relevancy of the information being received is assessed. For example, if the information being received is of relatively low importance, and the transmission is of relatively high importance, the reception may be deferred for receipt upon retransmission at a later time. Generally, relevancy of information is determined by conventional packet filters.

If the relevancy of the received information is known, a check at diamond 32 determines how important or timely is the data being received. This determination, in one embodiment, may involve a comparison of the importance of the information being transmitted and the importance of the information being received. In addition, the time sensitivity of the information being received and transmitted may be weighed. If the data is considered relevant, meaning that the data is of sufficient timeliness or importance, the transmission may continue to be deferred. However, if the data is of relatively low relevance, the transmission may be allowed to proceed. In some cases relevancy may also be weighed by determining whether the data will automatically be available for reception at periodic intervals in the future.

Thus, in some embodiments of the present invention, communications over independent wireless networks may be controlled to reduce interference through the operation of the application 16 and a general purpose processor 12. In some embodiments, this allows a single wireless device to participate in more than one networks and/or to use more than one wireless protocol.

While the present invention has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art will appreciate numerous modifications and variations therefrom. It is intended that the appended claims cover all such modifications and variations as fall within the true spirit and scope of this present invention. 

1. A method, comprising: receiving information about time criticality of a wireless transmission to be transmitted over a first wireless network; receiving information about time criticality of a wireless reception received over a second wireless network; and deferring the wireless transmission based on a determination of the time criticality of the wireless transmission relative to the time criticality of the wireless reception; wherein at least one of the first and second wireless networks is a Bluetooth network.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the relative time criticality of the wireless transmission and the wireless reception is based on a relative importance of the wireless transmission and the wireless reception.
 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the relative time criticality of the wireless transmission and the wireless reception is based on whether the wireless reception will be available for reception in the future.
 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the wireless reception is being received at a same time as the determination.
 5. An apparatus, comprising a processor; a first wireless interface for a first wireless network; a second wireless interface for a second wireless network; an antenna coupled to at least one of the first and second wireless interfaces; wherein the apparatus is to: receive, from a first device, a request through the first wireless interface to transmit information over the first wireless network; receive a communication from a second device through the second wireless interface; defer the transmission of the information based on a determination of relative time criticality of the transmission and the communication; wherein at least one of the first and second networks is a Bluetooth network.
 6. The apparatus of claim 5, wherein one of the first and second networks is to be a Bluetooth network and another of the first and second networks is to be a non-Bluetooth network.
 7. The apparatus of claim 5, wherein the transmission and the communication are to operate on at least one common frequency.
 8. The apparatus of claim 5, wherein at least one of transmission and the communication are to operate in an ultra-wide band network.
 9. An article comprising a medium storing instructions that, if executed by a processor-based system, perform operations comprising: receiving, from a first device, a request through a first wireless interface to transmit information over a first wireless network; receiving a communication from a second device in a second wireless network through a second wireless interface; defer the transmission of the information based on a determination of relative time criticality of the transmission and the communication; wherein at least one of the first and second networks is a Bluetooth network.
 10. The article of claim 9, wherein the determination is based at least in part on relative importance of the transmission compared to relative importance of the communication.
 11. The article of claim 9, wherein the determination is based at least in part on whether the communication will be available for reception again. 